MESA-INTEL: warning: Haswell Vulkan support is incompleteĠ024:fixme:file:NtLockFile I/O completion on lock not implemented yetĠ024:fixme:urlmon:InternetBindInfo_GetBindString not supported string type 20Ġ118:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1. Ii winetricks 0.0+20210206-2 all simple tool to work around common problems iĠ034:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ064:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ034:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ064:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ05c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ05c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ06c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ06c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ02c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ02c:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ024:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ0bc:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ0bc:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ024:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1.Ġ0c4:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 29 not handled, platform 1.Ġ0c4:fixme:font:get_name_record_codepage encoding 20 not handled, platform 1. Ii wine64-preloader 6.0.3~repack-1 amd64 Windows API implementation - prelinked 64-bi> Ii wine64 6.0.3~repack-1 amd64 Windows API implementation - 64-bit binary l> Ii wine32-preloader:i386 6.0.3~repack-1 i386 Windows API implementation - prelinked 32-bi> Ii wine32:i386 6.0.3~repack-1 i386 Windows API implementation - 32-bit binary l> Ii wine-stable 3.0.1ubuntu1 all Windows API implementation (transitional pac> One to set the IP address, and one to set the connection's method of obtaining an IP address to manual: nmcli connection modify ethernet-enp0s8-1 ipv4.address 192.168.1.40/24. To achieve that, you need to issue two commands. Next time you have connectivity issues, let ping be the first tool you turn to. The ping command is simple, but it can be eyes and ears out on the vast expanse that is your network. You can find more information for gping on Github. Ii wine-binfmt 6.0.3~repack-1 all Register Wine as the interpreter for Windows> To match our network, we need a fixed IP address of 192.168.1.40 for our new connection. Theres even a GUI for ping: Gping is available for Linux, macOS, and Windows. Ii wine 6.0.3~repack-1 all Windows API implementation - standard suite ||/ Name Version Architecture Description |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend I found a post which suggests running "sudo setcap -r /usr/bin/wine-preloader" however that file does not exist on my system.įailed to set capabilities on file `/usr/bin/wine-preloader' (No such file or directory)ĭesired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold Unfortunately it seem the route command is not available. So I conclude that wine is seeing the interfaces at least. I then ran ipconfig, and I do get the correct output with the correct interfaces and all the correct information. In troubleshooting the issue, I tried to ping my local gateway and get the 4 ICMP timeouts when run via "wine cmd". If firewalls are involved, then as others have suggested, make use of tools such as nmap and whatever else.I am trying to run kindle via however I cannot connect to the network from wine. Just to complete this, if there is no host on the IP that you try - it will hang for a little while, and the timeout - the same thing that would happen if the receiving host had a firewall with a drop filter. Rather than telnet however, I'd probably use something like scapy, write up something that looks for the RST flag and let's you know. The fact that you received a RST packet means that there is indeed a host up at the other end, and as a bonus - you've done so undetected (The TCP/IP had no upper-layer application to talk to about this connection). What's actually happening is that the TCP/IP stack on the host is sending you back a TCP segment with the RST bit set - i.e. This should happen immediately, unless the host is dropping packets. Telnet: connect to address 10.211.55.3: Connection refused You can use any tool you like, but we can just use telnet. It doesn't matter what port you connect to, and in fact, if you connect to a port that's unlikely to have a service running, you can get the job done without being detected. If you have not firewalls and routers in the way, i.e., if you're on the same segment as the host you're trying to check - most of the solutions above are a little exhaustive imho.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |